iweb analytics

Tears For Fifty Years

By Janet Wilson June 3rd, 2010

It was poet and philosopher George Santayana who said, “Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.”  Such is the case with TVNZ’s homage to its own history, the jauntily named “Cheers To 50 Years.”

This was a programme touted as a celebration of all that we’ve known and loved on the box for the past half-century but which resulted in the boring vying with the banal for two excruciating, culture-cringing hours.

Given that TVNZ began broadcasting in this country – and indeed were the only game in town for nearly thirty years – you’d think that they’d want to mark the moment using the not inconsiderable resources of their Archives, which is, let’s face it, a rich resource to exploit.

What we got was a mash-up of the State Broadcaster at its worst, a game-show that was so badly done even host Jason Gunn looked as if he was dying from rigor mortis by the programme’s end.

Jason Gunn, Cheers to 50 Years Host

Jason Gunn, Cheers to 50 Years Host

The panel was comprised of children who barely knew the answers to this decades telly questions, let alone the last 50, while those who actually made television history were caught in cut-away shots in the audience, no doubt thanking their lucky stars they weren’t actually up on-stage, dying like their younger colleagues.

TVNZ; Back To The Future

TVNZ; Back To The Future

The channel responded to the national thumbs down in their usual, insular way.  “Well, it rated,” was their answer.

Ratings have now become television’s gold and only standard.  The ultimate in quantity over quality.

So it was a terrible programme that was an insult to its audience and all who worked on it? Who cares, it rated, mate!

Ratings equal revenue. It’s the cash coming in that counts for a beleaguered broadcaster like TVNZ. Best business news headline of the week, by the way, was the one that said “TVNZ Makes A Small Profit – Much to Its Surprise”.

I suspect the high ratings the programme received indicated more an audience desire to enjoy an evening of television nostalgia (a desire cruelly thwarted by the self-congratulatory twaddle they were dished up) than any real viewer endorsement of what they received.

This supposed showcase of TVNZ’s cultural fire-power comes at an interesting juncture in its survival. Television, like all media, is at a crossroads. Its future depends on its ability to be relevant to its audiences.  After all, ‘Content On Every Screen’ is the network’s mission statement.

“Cheers” was not relevant, did not engage its audience and simply burned off a lot of preciously needed viewer loyalty and respect for TVNZ.

Interestingly, just 24 hours before this excrement was dished up, the network launched Heartland Channel, not surprisingly on its own Freeview platform but on Sky, the competition.

Heartland, a channel comprised of “repeats”, is a much better tribute to our television history than “Cheers to 50 Years” could ever hope to have been.

Maybe we’ll be better served by the documentary series “50 Years of Television” screening on Prime from Sunday, June 13th.

How ironic if a private broadcaster, funded by NZ ON Air, delivers a better serving of our TV history than the official state broadcaster.

So, a final irony. Whereas TVNZ could have accessed some marvellous archive material for free, no doubt Prime has had to pay top dollar for the same privilege using tax-payers money.

I bet it’ll be no-contest on which network delivers the better product.

9 Responses to “Tears For Fifty Years”

  • Matty1999 says:

    Totally agree. Turned off after 5 mins. High ratings is almost inverse to quality.

  • Rob says:

    I really wanted to enjoy this. I’ve been getting all nostalgic about the TV intro songs they’ve been playing over the radio and television this last couple of weeks… but it was unbearable. I lasted maybe 15 minutes before wandering off to do something more productive.

  • Stopped watching TV Nov 20th 2009 when we moved house. I don’t miss it all. The thing that really surprised me was that my teenage daughter hasn’t even complained. TV has become boring repetitive and mindless. When we moved house the TV didn’t work when I plugged it into the aerial point and I have never bothered to fixit. We use it for watching DVD’s so it’s not a complete waste of space.
    If I wan’t insightful comment on the issues of the day I watch Jon Stewart on the daily show online. NZ needs this kind of online show where you can have in-depth discussion.

  • citizen_parable says:

    It was an appalling piece of television. My understanding is TVNZ were offered an in depth documentary series covering the history of NZ television, they said ‘no, thanks’ and Prime snapped it up. Seems some moronic consultancy-think mentality at TVNZ can only envisage the anniversary as an opportunity to leverage the past to sell the future.

  • Trish says:

    Jane Clifton wrote in the Dominion Post that in taking a programme most likely to appeal to older people and adapting it to appeal to younger people,TVNZ made nobody happy.

    Except themselves of course, because it rated well.
    (More about that on Brian Edwards blog http://brianedwardsmedia.co.nz/.But watching and enjoying are two different things. I wonder how many people suffered on just to catch a glimpse of those old clips, hating every minute of the show’s format.

    I recorded it to watch later, caught 10 minutes of it on air and deleted the recording. It was too awful to watch. Looking forward to Prime’s offerering

  • Jim Cluckingbird says:

    You’d have to say — that, only those who couldn’t claim more than a double-digit IQ, would’ve endured this abomination. And even, then, they’d be fidgeting after the first 5 minutes.

  • D'Arcy Wetlock says:

    Prime TV is doing a good job with their review of the last 50 years of television.. It’ll be interesting to see how TVNZ goes this Sunday. Churlish of thenn to go head-to-head with Prime, though.

Leave a Comment