Notice anything different about the front page of the Royal New Zealand Herald lately?
Take yesterdays headlines; “What Your Home’s Worth”, “The Envelope Please….Oscars Special” and “Mayoress Speaks Out” a teaser to a page three piece of dross which had Michael Laws’s wife, Wanganui’s Mayoress Leonie Brookhammer, denying she had left the family home because of a supposed ‘violent confrontation’ that had been misleadingly reported in the Herald on Sunday.
Ms Brookhammer later published a damning response to the story on Dave Farrar’s “Kiwiblog” site.
Equally, ‘The Lockout of Auckland’ also came from the same Fear and Smear School of Journalism, generating more hysteria than light on the subject of Auckland governance.
If all of this shabby tabloid tack seems more reminiscent of the Herald’s sister paper the “Herald on Sunday” (known by the apt acronym the HoS) there’s a reason for that.
HoS Editor, Shayne Currie, has just been made Deputy Editor of the NZ Herald.
And with this appointment comes Currie’s news values.
Values that put the sex lives of so-called celebrities in the frame alongside crime and property values because that’s what gets the punters in front of their computer screens if not actually holding the hardcopy version in their hands.
Shayne Currie, on the rise at APN with Sarah Stewart, APN senior management
Currie would say that it worked for him at the HoS and to a certain degree, commercially speaking, he’s right.
The paper boasted a healthy readership of 382,000 at the end of last year, according to Nielsen Media Research figures.
There’s no doubt that he’s being elevated to the Deputy Editorship to eventually replace incumbent Tim Murphy.
Word from the floor of the Herald newsroom is that Murphy is being elevated higher and higher in the organization, his control over the daily coverage of the paper declining as Currie’s grip tightens.
Readers may remember Murphy’s predecessor as editor Gavin Ellis who was elevated to a point where he eventually evaporated.
And when Currie is in day-to-day control of the paper the question is: What happens to the Herald’s long established role as the newspaper of record?
What will happen to the Herald’s proud record of investigative reporting, detailed commentary and analysis and extensive political coverage?
Going, going, gone.
All those virtues are certainly missing from his former paper, the HoS.
In fits of black humour some Herald journalists are already “Currie-ising” their stories, writing the most tabloid version of the most mundane issues.
To their horror, some who submitted these jokes found themselves praised and the stories printed prominently.
Currie’s reputation as a news manager is Old School.
He’s said to verbally strong-arm his reporters into producing stories by announcing “There’s a hole on the front page of this paper with your name on it.”
Little wonder that under his watch and this kind of pressure the HoS produced some of the most scummiest journalism – and journalists – this country has ever seen.
Back in October, 2005 there was John Manukia who was sacked for allegedly frabricating a story about former South Auckland police officer, Anthony Solomona.
Interestingly, Manukia was named in a brief of evidence about another muckraker, Stephen Cook. In the brief, Cook said that Manukia would be dispatched to the rival Fairfax presses in South Auckland on Saturday night to get an early copy of the Star-Times.
Manukia would take the paper back to the HoS offices and acting under the aegis of senior staff “would proceed to lift stories from the SST without any attribution for publication the following day’s HoS,” Cook said.
Currie admitted to this happening on “possibly two, possibly three occasions in 2005.”
Stephen Cook is a classic Currie appointment – before it all ended in tears.
The former Assistant Editor of the HoS was infamous for pressuring Debbie Gerbich, a colleague of bent cop Brad Shipton’s, into giving him an interview on being told he knew she was advertising for bondage partners.
Gerbich subsequently committed suicide.
The HoS under Currie is a paper of few morals and even fewer scruples.
In his farewell editorial at the HoS Currie said he didn’t mind that “Over the years we’ve become known as the property paper, the car crash paper, the Tony Veitch paper, the All Blacks paper and the Millie Elder paper”.
In other words, he takes pride in printing the crass, the banal, and the predictable.
Take note of his next words; “Selling the paper is of utmost importance, and to achieve that it’s not what be considered the best, traditional journalism that makes the front page”. Or, one suspects, any page.
These are the news values he brings the daily NZ Herald and anyone who buys the Herald because historically it has produced “the best, traditional journalism” is about to be bitterly disappointed.
God Save the Royal New Zealand Herald and all who have to read it.
Bravo Janet!
One thing for the HOS to be a tabloid but NZ can not possibly be ready for a gutter daily tabloid.
Currie belongs in Indian restaurants, not in any sort of reputable news source.
All corporatised media is now totally out of control. These journalists are little more than streetwalkers kowtowing to the corporate dollar doing simply anything they have to to keep their jobs intact and their mortgages paid. Providing the publics soma, they tap into their customers deeply ravaged personal anxiety softly leading their willing lemmings on towards more corporately created financial stress. Owned and now totally controlled by financial interests they are nothing but the most evil of human drones,quite prepared to deliver the final “Coup de Grace” to their powerless customer, a non being they simply now never even think of.They are deeplysick narcissists in charge of very powerful media/propaganda outlets. We are now there, people in charge of media but with no hearts and no minds and no consciences. Roll on the failure of corporately controlled stocks and roll on the recovery of human character. All is money/profit and people/customers mean nothing. Shame on you guys, you are profiliterating the systematic rape of humanity.You are nothing but the willing agents of evil.
Steady on Paul – I dont think things are all that bad. I spend a lot of my time working with young journalists and
most of those are extremely honest people and have a strong desire to be good writers.
Any study of the history of journalism, will show you that there are good and bad times for the media in terms of its freedom from commercial interests – but there was certainly no Golden Age. The arguments you see between editors, readers and proprietors today are very similar to the arguments that were going on in the Victorian era.
News that isnt funded by the state has a commercial imperative to make money – otherwise it dies out altogether. The trick is to get the balance right and have a strong gap between advertisers and editorial.
I dont personally know Shayne or his style of editing so dont want to comment on him – but it is important that NZ and other countries of course, breed editors with a backbone, good news sense, an eye for an interesting story and a knack for good news which also sells. It is very easy to sell Tony Veitch – it is harder to sell climate change – we need editors with the brains and ability to sell the latter.
[...] Shock, Horror!!! Holding The Front Page At The Royal NZ Herald … [...]
[...] Shock, Horror!!! Holding The Front Page At The Royal NZ Herald « Bespoke Media Training [...]
@James, can you show me one of your “editors with the brains and ability to sell”? They exist in small communities but no longer in big communities, where they need Corporate Horses capable of being ridden. There is a great need for change in our world but those most in need of change are now heavily “Institutionalized”, and it this institutional Corporate influence that resists change the most of all. Banks cannot change because the Banking industry is totally institutionalized and it is now a Goliath. Another institution now quite incapable of change is our modern Corporate media. Quite incapable of exhibiting the necessary balance needed to drive any kind of change. It’s not rocket science. James in all these sectors you do have conscious humans but they simply cannot speak freely anymore because their jobs are at stake. This is why I say Journalism as we have known it is a very dead duck. Sorry mate,Quack querwk! Blogging is the only freedom left but it is seldom read, crazy world eh James?
I consider myself to be up to date in current affairs by watching TV news and reading NZ Herald. I found out recently that I can still be knowledgeable in current affairs by abandoning watching TV and reading NZ Herald, so I had canceled my Herald subscription mid year last year (2009). I mainly get my news and current affairs from the internet and thus avoid information overload at the same time. Both TV news and print media they bring rubbish to the viewers & readers. They have more guest appearances from or print useless stories about psychics rather than anything of real substance.
James Murray said…
“we need editors with the brains and ability to sell the latter”
Yes, you’re right there James! Anyone who studies journalism is someone who has no brain at all. Put it this way, candidates who would want to apply to University to study subjects that need brains such as engineering or science for example, but get rejected on the ground/s that they’re low achievers (may be they got low marks at high school) would definitely find themselves easily accepted to enroll in journalism courses. We know what that means.
I think that journalism schools should up their game by requiring their students to take papers in science and engineering as part of their courses. This will definitely make them knowledgeable in their reporting capabilities when they complete their courses.
Such a true article, the news media in NZ is becoming a disgrace at the hands of cheesy little characters like Currie. Reading the NZ Herald is becoming distasteful, but worse, they’re ignoring the responsibilty they have on shaping society in NZ.
@Falafulu Well I studied at journalism school as a post-grad and I dont think my course was full of unintelligent people at all. I think it is certainly useful to have studied a subject outside the media though before you learn the trade of being a journalist. I Dont agree that people who excel at engineering or science necessarily make good journalists though – people with these skills are often highly detailed mono-thinkers – a journalist needs to be an intelligent, jack of all trades – able to understand something complex and then write about it in a way that those who are not experts in a field are able to understand and enjoy. That’s not to say there arent people who dont have both sets of skills.
@Paul – well I am an editor of a reasonable big corporate news organisation. Although it is not up to me to talk about my skills etc – however, I regularly make decisions about stories, editorial and commission writers with no demands from the corporate side of the business. I have never once been told to do something or not do something for an advertiser (with the obvious and necessary exception of things like competitions).
I am also a bit confused about what you have written – you say large media organisations lack the necessary balance to move forward but then say the only way forward is bloggers – who are on the whole unbalanced. Which do you mean – do you foresee a world where we get our news from small micro organisations like bloggers, all of whom may have their own agenda?
It can obviously take larger media organisations longer to roll with the times – they are by nature a bit slower because of their size – however, that does not mean there are not people of high ability within those organisations driving change.
These people do exist – they need to be supported by current management (and where I work they are) and allowed to thrive and put their stamp on mainstream news.
As for editors with the necessary skills at big newspapers etc – Rusbridger at the Guardian, Andrew Marr would have been great at the independent if he had come in at a diff time.
“God Save the Royal New Zealand Herald and all who have to read it.”
As grim as that, you reckon?
@james, Just look at the US society struggling to move forward in some small way and being constantly sat on by it’s Corporate institutions. The stock markets thirty years of growth has now made it an immovable multi faceted hydra “institution” of, banking, insurance, health and commodity trading incapable of any socially supportive change at all. Without the balance of a solvent “marketplace” free makrket economics simply falls apart and nothing can happen financially except a slow decay. Surely we should be moving toward freedom and fulfillment and not towards a simplistic form of corporate slavery. Do you think your “paid” voice makes a difference James? I wish you luck .To me you sound like a perfect corporate horse, full of self but lacking in perspective, unable to see past your own performance in your job. Giddy up James, giddy up. No its going to take balls my friend not words. Sorry mate, but I don’t think any of this is a joke as I think you might. Children people and families come before dollars, allways.
Q: “What will happen to the Herald’s proud record of investigative reporting, detailed commentary and analysis and extensive political coverage?”
A: What a load of bollocks. If the Herald ever had such a record it hasn’t had it since 1994 when I started reading it.
Sorry Janet, either you have been asleep for the last 16 years
or you are talking out your arse luv. Sure, there are a few decent writers, Gaynor, Amstrong and O! Sullivan. But “investigative”? Come on girl, get a job you know something about.
@Paul – thanks Paul for your measured, well thought out and friendly comments. I hope you enjoy spending your time trying to insult people you have never met and making wild assumptions based on little or no evidence.
I am not denying there are problems in the corporate world that can hold the media back – my point is that these financial constraints have always existed. There has been no golden period for journalism where they didnt exist. The first newspapers in the UK were colloquially called Scandalsheets for Christ’s sake – hardly a virtuous press determined to hold the state to account. During the First World War – newspapers were largely the craven puppets of a propaganda mad govt. During the seventies they all got a bit obsessed with unions and then in the eighties they succumbed to the power of Thatcherism. Papers have been owned by a mish miash of crazy, financially driven proprietors since their inception.
Of course some times are better than others and these times I would say are somewhere inbetween – certainly better than the rampant tabloidism of the mid-90s, but a little too afraid to offend in some cases. During all of the bad times as well – there are numerous examples of journalists who work for mainstream media organisations bucking the trend.
As for balls Paul – what do you even mean by that – in what context do you mean that “balls” will change the media industry. Be more specific – it is all very well tearing something down and being the armchair critic, it is something else to actually try and change something.
I also think you are making a mass generalisation about a worldwide industry that by its size is necessarily varietal. Within journalism, as with any trade, you will get people trying to do good, people who don’t care and people actively trying to do bad. The same counts for individual papers and television stations.
Point 1, I’m a veteran of thirty years in the media James.I have watched and seen a huge amount of change and many things I shouldn’t have. There is a huge difference between the present environment and set of circumstances and what has gone before,everything has changed.In the seventies the media industry was in its total infancy, a literal screeching baby struggling to walk in its fathers black inked “journalistic” shoes. In the ensuing forty years it has grown at a huge rate to quite gargantuan proportions and is now capable of heavily influencing whole countries on a worldwide basis. Not only is modern media a multi headed Corporate hydra now days but alongside it dark suits stand a great number of the so called doyens of the “financial industry”, an industry that is now itself almost too gross to stand up on its own. Every corporate media entity in the world is in bed with a number of Banks or uber rich financiers, they have to be in order to play the modern media game at the listed Stock Market level that it is now played at. Look at our own TVNZ, seven floors of Corporate, and one of production. (And that floor is now almost gone completely )
The Corporate nature of our modern media empires mean that their influence on the public is huge and it also means they are quite incapable of change for the individual business’s well being. Successful modern media management is focused on stock market growth, not on local market growth, and that means Corporate entities cannot ever go “backwards”. Once you list on the stock market its “profit” and “take over” or be “taken over”, there is no middle ground. So what I am saying is that “journalism” as the profession it once was is quite literally a dead horse.I’m not being rude but the analogy of a Corporate Horse in a Corporate Industry is one which is very apt, if not right on the nose. The one thing that was unassailable about the old style of journalist was that they were not “team players” that most common of modern corporate “staff” requirements. In other words, they weren’t horses James.
Just a note James, if I’m right you work for TV3. Ownership very roughly. HT Media. (Hindustan Times 37% )Ironbridge Capital. 9.25%( Investment Banking ) Goldman Sachs J B Were 7.72% ( Investment Banking ), BNZ 4.17%, ( Banking ) Royal Bank of Scotland 8.44%.( Banking ) There will be many other interestes underneath the surface.
I may weeeeell have made the odd mistake James but the simple idea I have presented above is somewaht confirmed isn’t it. Neigh!!
Yes Paul you are right. I do work for 3 News – and yes we are owned by a conglomerate of corporate interests. It can make things tricky for us in news because a lot of the profit we generate goes to our investors.
But this doesn’t mean that they extend an editorial influence over us – or that they want to hold us back from the necessary changes that need to occur to keep journalism relevant to NZ society.
We may have to agree to disagree on this one Paul as we both seem to hold strong views on this. I would like you to consider though that there are a lot of young people working as journalists who don’t consider themselves to be horses (and I have to confess I am unclear as to whether I am supposed to be a horse or a dead horse).
They are talented people, with strong opinions – who are certainly not cowed by corporate owners. There are green shoots here and heavy doses of scepticism and fatalism will help no one.
@James, I have to say this, “tell that to your fast shrinking news audience’. They are not interested anymore because what is broadcast is unilaterally the same and incredibly lightweight and doesn’t address their very real problems.Even the personalities nowdays are “team players” forced to try and appeal to all. The TV biz is very different especially “NOW”, because your audience have no jobs, no money and neither do your advertisers and they won’t have for some time to come. Are any corporate journos or programs talking about why “this” financial crisis is hugely different to all others or are they just talking “around” the problem? Commentary will not hold an audience anymore. My comments are born out by the fact that TVNZ and 3 are now talking about mutually shifting to a half hour bulletin simply to save money. I know there are many Journos who feel strongly and are very good at their jobs, however that doesn’t change the “real” outcome of what is happening in any way. Journalism has been trivialised and crucuified by Corporate ownership over the last twenty years, now they might even sideline you completely simply because you now “cost” too much. Soon it will be no bulletin at all with five minute News Breaks between the sitcoms. I’ll put a pile of money on it. Thats why I am saying great personal courage and a completely new model is needed otherwise the craft of the word will simply be run over and all that will be left behind on the footpath will be a simpering inkblot. By the way anyone watched CNN lately? They used to be “it” for ages, now they are just one of a plethora of “worldwide” news gatherers and disseminators of “news” product. It doesn’t matter how dazzling a white dot any individual is anymore at home, if they are standing in front of the sun, they can simply not be seen. I am not a scetic or a fatalist in any way James, I’m a total realist about what is happening and has happened and I hope you are right and I am wrong. I still love Mr Ed though. A horse is a horse, of course of course. B4 your time I suspect.
@ Paul and James. You two fairies can save yourselves time and effort — with your rambling posts — by simply meeting up and banging your heads together. Remember, dudes, the lady has a score to settle here: the “HoS” epithet is a pointed reference to the fact — that, she does not like her private emails published. And that’s fair enough, too — but she does have an axe to grind.
Merv I can’t see how that makes what has been published here any less relevant. What she’s published is correct.
I add the HOS gossip columnist must have a grudge against Janet in the first place to print such garbage. Perhaps that’s because Janet manages to keep herself from the fridge more than Glucina.
“What she’s published is correct”.
Mmm…. always a bit wary of “begging the question”-type reasoning. Her critique probably has relevance. But you get the feeling it’s been contextualised within the singularity of “payback”. The author really needed to elevate her writing technique above the “Revenge” and the “Vindictive”. She’s succumbed to the low level that was deployed against her, by the use of the acronymic epithet “HoS”. Such is the level of her acrimony towards the Herald-On-Sunday, it just undercuts her message.
Merv, ???. You are one bizarre man? What verbal garbage, “contextualised within the singularity of payback” and “the acronymic epithet” you sound just like an appalingly bad 60’s era eloqution teacher who twists words untill they make no sense at all. The HOS is odd, but I find your comments far stranger to tell you the truth. You on anyones pay roll? What you say seems to have a far more personal axe to grind than any of us here?
Paul: Hell, after reading what you’ve just nailed up, you’ve shamed me in to swallowing my “verbal garbage”, whole. I defer to your literary prowess.
BTW, you’ll need to ask Mum what “HOS” stands for; it’s her job to instruct you in “adult” education. Say it’s an acronym…err, a three-letter abbreviation, for a slur.
Furthering Paul MACK’s education: HOS = “Heap o’$#@*” or black rapper’s vernacular for “gardening tools”.
Merv and Lil Wayne, ( Wrodyl? ) You have to be one and the same person.Thats weird in itself.
Ignorance, aggression and insult are not something to be proud of “boys”.They are simply the tools of an ignorant stupid bullying human,something the paper we are referring to is a champion of.
Janet, is this all NZ can muster, a Corporate Journalist, a scandel rag and two bully boys? No wonder we are in the mess we are in.
Paul Mack and Paul McGreal (Paulie? ) “You have to be one and the same person.Thats weird in itself”.
Me, a “bully”? I’m the one with the guts ache, after being forced to ingest my own “verbal garbage”.
Look, if you really want to kick sand in my face — go to the nearest library (sorry, BE) and borrow the book “Consider the Lobster” (by the late David Foster Wallace), it’s a series of short easy-to-read essays. And, if you’re in to tennis, you must read the chapter on “Tracy Austin”; you won’t find a better article, about the sport, anywhere. Whatever you do, DO NOT pick up his book, “Infinite Jest”, because it will kill you. Literally (both meanings) and figuratively.
There, I do believe we can be friends.
Ahggh Wrodyl Eggwhyte rides again. I rest my case.( you still won’t be honest about who you are with the public, shame Im sure we all would like to know, what your new name on facebook Wrodyl )
Well, that was a fine example of civilized discourse.
MS Wilson is right.
The Herald has become a tacky print version of TVNZ news. No substance, no brains, no effort, no relevance. So long as it is salacious, sensational, sadistic or sordid, it will be published.
In the good old days, it was called The Truth.
James, look at the following article from the good people at “Silly Beliefs” website and see the pathetic manipulations by TV3 editorials of the tape of Jeanette Wilson’s (local psychic) performance for a TV3 show some years ago :
“Jeanette Wilson – Psychic Medium ”
http://www.sillybeliefs.com/wilson.html
This was a deliberate fraud and TV3 was a party to that.
James Murray said…
I Dont agree that people who excel at engineering or science necessarily make good journalists though – people with these skills are often highly detailed mono-thinkers – a journalist needs to be an intelligent, jack of all trades – able to understand something complex and then write about it in a way that those who are not experts in a field are able to understand and enjoy.
I co-authored the following article (see below) as a guest post at Not PC blog which I highlighted how unintelligent some journalists are such as Melanie Reid from TV3. Read the article yourself and then see how narrow Melanie’s knowledge in that she didn’t ask the hard questions. She was taken for a ride by psychic Jeanette Wilson without Melanie being aware of it.
My point here, is that had Melanie completed some training in science/engineering (on top of her journalism courses), she could have seen the holes in Jeanette Wilson’s psychic ability claims right in front of her eyes. She couldn’t see those holes herself. Do you see her journalism ability as intelligent as you stated above, James? To me I see that as dumb.
“GUEST POST: Quacks, quacks, quacks”
http://pc.blogspot.com/2010/02/guest-post-quacks-quacks-quacks.html
I believe that Melanie Reid or any other top journalist (so called intelligent ones) from TV3 at the time of filming the show wouldn’t have picked that up, i.e. see the holes in Jeanette Wilson’s psychic ability claims.
There was nothing in the interview of psychic Jeanette Wilson that Melanie Reid did with her, that you need special skills in order to conduct the interview. I could have done that interview myself. The important point that I am highlighting, is that I could have put forward certain questions to Jeanette Wilson that Melanie herself wouldn’t have thought of and you can probably figure out why. A journalist with a background in science/engineering is not a one-dimensional is it?
This is why I think that journalism school must up the ante by requiring their students to do some papers in science for their degree programs. It makes them wider in their thinking capability.
Hey, Paul MACK — or, is it now “PM” (being the very latest incarnation of our peripatetic wonderboy): There’s also the Asian-speak version of our rapper’s take, on:
HOS = “gardening tools”; by the subtle inflection of the first word, which then sounds like “garnering”. It’s also the more literal definition.
Filling the gaps in your education, I am.
Janet, your agenda is showing ! The recent publishing of your embarrassing personal emails by the HoS really got your goat, eh?
One can only imagine the absolute joy Miss Glucina is revelling in, knowing she got right under your skin.
I find Carolyne Meng-Yee from the Herald as one of the dumbest journalist today. I think that she is better at flipping cheese burgers at McDonald than her being a journalist. Reading most of her articles made me wondered what sort of knowledge that she gained from her study at journalism school. I am keen to know of what taught her that makes her so bad in a reporting job that she is supposed to excel at? Umm, journalism qualification!!!
‘Crapman’ — I think you’re right. Carolyne Meng-Yee’s writings always convey the tenor of “anxiousness” in her reporting. She, obviously, wants to please her editorial bosses by penning “titillating grunt” into a vapid story (to excite the vacuous). But, in doing so, she surrenders the “deft hand” in favour of the “lanoline hand” — that is, preferring a “slippery hold of the truth”.
Can’t see her journalistic vectors heading upwards, if she doesn’t reach for the soap.
Merve, I’ll also include Francesca Mold from TVNZ as one of the dumbest reporter today (perhaps in par with Herald’s Carolyne Meng-Yee), especially her interview of John Key about Mr. Key’s shares in a mining company. The interview was dull, i.e., not news at all, since Key had already declared the mining shares in his register of interests. I am no John Key fan as he is more socialist than Helen Clark but Francesca Mold was trying to make news with something irrelevant and non issue for anyone to even care about it.
You done said it right, again, bro’. Dunno what it is with those — youthful — TVNZ female reporters: they have this ever-increasing childlike, wide-eyed earnestness which just grates. A kinda gushy, breathless frothiness — that’s never congruent to the weight of the topic being reported on.
I’m “effed” if I can figure out why these feckless “kids” insist on taking their picnic hampers into the woods, when they always get bitten by a rabid wolf.
It just tears me up, to see the seasoned reporters, like, Ian Sinclair et al banished to a Siberian gulag.
Whether Janet has an agenda or not, I can attest that working for the Currie is a depressing experience which doesn’t require any complicated theories about rampant corporatism. The guy is simply a know-nothing with the imagination of a tadpole and a temper on him.
“The guy is simply a know-nothing with the imagination of a tadpole and a temper on him.”
Quit sitting on the fence: do you or do you not — like mr. currie?
[url=http://moodle.dxigalicia.com/b/b11cd-buy-phentermine-without-prescription.php]phentermine 37.5 next day delivery[/url] nasacort aciphex aciphex phentermine prescription pharmacy = [url=http://sites.tisd.org/moodle/b/258ae-buy-phentermine-without-prescription-overnight-delivery.php]2mg xanax order[/url] phentermine online without prescription = [url=http://elearning.unisla.pt/b/033a-buy-phentermine-without-prior-prescription.php]Ambien[/url] 2mg xanax no prescription fedex = [url=http://moodle.lopionki.pl/b/fc4c-buy-phentermine-without-rx.php]Ambien[/url] 2mg xanax no prescription = [url=http://moodle.winslowk12.org/b/33f48-buy-phentermine-yellow.php]Xanax[/url] 2mg xanax overnight shipping = [url=http://moodle.aldeae.com/b/4654-buy-phentermine-yellow-without-prescription.php]Valium[/url] 2mg xanax no prescription = [url=http://moodle.winslowk12.org/b/a752-buy-prescription-drugs-xanax.php]Xanax[/url] 2mg xanax order = [url=http://moodle.trinityhigh.com/b/26f36-buy-prozac-phentermine.php]order phentermine by phone no script[/url] cheapest phentermine pills no prescription = [url=http://moodle.wilmette39.org:8888/moodle/b/9019-buy-really-cheap-xanax-online.php]Phentermine[/url] 30 mg phentermine no prescription needed = [url=http://uanl-enlinea.com/moodle/b/7c1c-buy-topamax-phentermine.php]Ambien[/url] 2mg xanax order